We do understand orthogonal vectors, but what are orthogonal subspaces.
What is it meant for two subspaces to be orthogonal?
Let's consider two subspaces S and U. S and U are orthogonal if,
note
Every vectors in S is orthogonal to every vectors in U.
Example,
note
For a 3-Dimensional space are X-Y plane and X-Z plane orthogonal? NO,
consider two vectors,
xXY=⎣⎡110⎦⎤∈Rn,yYZ=⎣⎡011⎦⎤∈Rn
and xXY⋅yYZ=0 so they are not orthogonal to each other.
info
If two subspaces meet on some vector then they are not orthogonal, except 0.
We said that x∈N(A) is orthogonal to all row vectors.
But this doesn't mean that null space is orthogonal to the row space.
For that we need to check for all of the linear combinations of row vectors.
If all of the linear combinations of row vectors are orthogonal to x∈N(A),
then we can say that Row space is orthogonal to Null space.
note
We discovered that
riTx=0;∀i={1,2,⋯,m}
⇒ciriTx=0;∀i={1,2,⋯,m} and ci∈R
so any combination of ciriTx=0.
So we can see that linear combinations of row vectors are orthogonal to x∈N(A).
info
Now we can say that Row space is orthogonal to Null space.
We said that x∈N(AT) is orthogonal to all column vectors.
But this doesn't mean that left null space is orthogonal to the column space.
For that we need to check for all of the linear combinations of column vectors.
If all of the linear combinations of column vectors are orthogonal to x∈N(AT),
then we can say that column space is orthogonal to left null space.
note
We discovered that
⇒ciTx=0;∀i={1,2,⋯,n}
⇒αiciTx=0;∀i={1,2,⋯,n} and αi∈R
so any combination of αiciTx=0.
So we can see that linear combinations of column vectors are orthogonal to x∈N(AT).
info
Now we can say that Column space is orthogonal to Left null space.